Comments on: TASR Review http://selfinvestors.com/tradingstocks/stocks/tasr-review/ ETF, IPO & Breakout Stocks Analysis, Tracking & Research Sat, 06 Aug 2011 03:46:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Miles Colcock http://selfinvestors.com/tradingstocks/stocks/tasr-review/comment-page-1/#comment-11 Miles Colcock Sun, 19 Dec 2004 04:33:51 +0000 http://www.selfinvestors.com/tradingstocks/?p=25#comment-11 <p>Tasr's. It seems to me that the latest press releases from Tasr do not speak of its stand a lone safty, but rather use the arguement that less lives and lawsuits occur because of is usage, ie. (if it wasn't used they would be more deaths or injury caused by batons, guns, etc. used to subdue citizens in police situations.</p> <p>While I am no scientist, it would appear that some 80 people or so have been reported to have died within a day or less after being stunned with a Tasr. If, true, this is pecuiler and I wonder when these allegations will be or if they will be substantiated. I get the impression law enforcement like the weapon so much which is understandable, that they may be resistance to studying it further.</p> <p>One thing I have wondered, that in researching the effects of lighting on people, they are current theories that lighting kills a person only when your heart is a very percise part of its beat cycle, and should this be the case when a certain electrical current stikes you, it can stop your heart. Something to do with interuptting the the electrical charge that operates our hearts when its going from postive to negative, and the lighting studies suggest that as this precise time, we are vulnerable to electrical shock, or our hearts are anyway.</p> <p>While the tasr concept is 'cool', I suspect it will be regulated, this will probaly occur before or when some high school student zaps a teacher or some such events begin occuring outside of law enforcement.</p> <p>Tasr,check out the lighting thing?</p> Tasr’s. It seems to me that the latest press releases from Tasr do not speak of its stand a lone safty, but rather use the arguement that less lives and lawsuits occur because of is usage, ie. (if it wasn’t used they would be more deaths or injury caused by batons, guns, etc. used to subdue citizens in police situations.

While I am no scientist, it would appear that some 80 people or so have been reported to have died within a day or less after being stunned with a Tasr. If, true, this is pecuiler and I wonder when these allegations will be or if they will be substantiated. I get the impression law enforcement like the weapon so much which is understandable, that they may be resistance to studying it further.

One thing I have wondered, that in researching the effects of lighting on people, they are current theories that lighting kills a person only when your heart is a very percise part of its beat cycle, and should this be the case when a certain electrical current stikes you, it can stop your heart. Something to do with interuptting the the electrical charge that operates our hearts when its going from postive to negative, and the lighting studies suggest that as this precise time, we are vulnerable to electrical shock, or our hearts are anyway.

While the tasr concept is ‘cool’, I suspect it will be regulated, this will probaly occur before or when some high school student zaps a teacher or some such events begin occuring outside of law enforcement.

Tasr,check out the lighting thing?

]]>